free hosting   image hosting   hosting reseller   online album   e-shop   famous people 
Free Website Templates
Free Installer

Bentarasko Benta Section 13
Page 02

The best ideas come from Bentarasko moments.

Bentarasko

Bentarasko Home

Bentarasko Sitemap

Bentarasko Dir 01

Bentarasko Dir 02

Bentarasko Dir 03

Bentarasko Dir 04

Bentarasko Dir 05

Bentarasko Dir 06

Bentarasko Dir 07

Bentarasko Dir 08

Bentarasko Dir 09

Bentarasko Dir 10

Bentarasko Dir 11

Bentarasko Dir 12

Bentarasko Dir 13

Bentarasko Dir 14

Bentarasko Dir 15

Bentarasko Dir 16

Bentarasko Dir 17

Bentarasko Dir 18

Bentarasko Dir 19

Bentarasko Dir 20

Bentarasko Benta Section 13
Page 02

The names by which tribes have been designated have rarely been names used by themselves, and the same tribe has often been designated by different names in different periods of its history and by different names in the same period of its history by colonies of people having different geographic relations to them. Often, too, different tribes have been designated by the same name. Without entering into an explanation of the causes which have led to this condition of things, it is simply necessary to assert that this has led to great confusion of nomenclature. Therefore the student of Indian history must be constantly on his guard in accepting the statements of any author relating to any tribe of Indians.

The earlier history of the Roman constitution has been already related. We have seen how, after a long struggle, the Plebeians acquired complete political equality with the Patricians. In the Second Punic War, the antagonism between the two orders had almost disappeared, and the only mark of separation between them in political matters was the regulation that, of the two Consuls and two Censors, one must be a Patrician and the other a Plebeian. Even this fell into disuse upon the rise of the new Nobility, of which we shall speak in the next chapter. The Patricians gradually dwindled away, and it became the custom to elect both Consuls and Censors from the Plebeians.

It is, at any rate, certain that after St. Chrysostom Christmas was observed on the 25th of December in East and West alike, except in the Armenian Church, which still remains faithful to January 6th. St. Chrysostom, who died in the beginning of the fifth century, informs us, in one of his Epistles, that Julius, on the solicitation of St. Cyril of Jerusalem, caused strict inquiries to be made on the subject, and thereafter, following what seemed to be the best authenticated tradition, settled authoritatively the 25th of December as the anniversary of Christ's birth, the _Festorum omnium metropolis_, as it is styled by Chrysostom. It may be observed, however, that some have represented this fixing of the day to have been accomplished by St. Telesphorus, who was Bishop of Rome A.D. 127-139, but the authority for the assertion is very doubtful.


[ Sec 13 Page 01 ] [ Sec 13 Page 02 ] [ Sec 13 Page 03 ] [ Sec 13 Page 04 ] [ Sec 13 Page 05 ]
[ Sec 13 Page 06 ] [ Sec 13 Page 07 ] [ Sec 13 Page 08 ] [ Sec 13 Page 09 ] [ Sec 13 Page 10 ]


This page is Copyright © Bentarasko and all rights are reserved. Please don't copy without proper authorization. References to other Web sites are not endorsements. Bentarasko offers no promises concerning the quality or content of other sites that Bentarasko provides links to. Links are not endorsements and are only provided for reference, information, and/or entertainment.